OBAMA WAS GOLDMAN SACH’S TOP RECIPIENT OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS IN 2008, SHOULDN’T HE GIVE THAT MONEY BACK?

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000085&type=P&sort=A&cycle=2008

Since all these banks donated all this income to domestic campaigns, as well as afterwards had to get bailed out, shouldn’t they take which income as well as give it behind to taxpayers? Why is Obama not endangered with this?

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

scott b May 1, 2010 at 12:45 am

No. Since the Right-leaning Supreme Court has now ruled that ANYONE can give ANYTHING to a campaign, I don’t see what your problem is

And, by the way, you may not know this…but almost all of the bank bailout money has been PAID BACK.

Dropkickmurphy May 1, 2010 at 12:59 am

Yes he should

but no he won’t

Now that is change you can believe in.

Paul Grass™ May 1, 2010 at 1:05 am

an honest man would, I bet he doesn’t

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

http://www.maxprofitsinvest.com