It’s disgusting, though I do not consider we can be the pig to be condemned. I was flattering certain in Jan 1994, the eccentric consultancy was allocated to examine Clinton’s Whitewater purpose as well as their personal finances, commercial operation as well as monetary policies in the 1980s. We know what the Pandora’s box which opened? Travelgate, Filegate, sex attacks (Kathryn Willey), debate financing, abuse of energy (IRS audits of Clinton enemies) Lewinsky not even proceed to “work” in the White House, took up 1995.Je That was the topping upon the cake, since the pig has motionless to distortion about it. He combined the review prior to obtaining his cloak was off. And something reduction than the volume misicule his crimes is what eventually removing criticized. Nobody gives the RIP, where he puts his twisted organ (unless you’re Paula Jones as well as Juanita Broaddrick). This allows we libs greatfully do not regulate longer investigates repub him for sex – it proposed prolonged prior to which as well as it still usually titre.schneid123 relavent when many libraries have been perfectionist Bush be attempted for his supposed “crime” as well as your H2O is for Willy been indicted (libs difference not mine) have the attribute sexuelles.Quittez hold which the Lewinsky review was over as well as I will stop bringing the law to your attention.
BILL CLINTON STILL REALLY SUCK?
Previous post: CASH?
Next post: TO GUARANTEE THAT THE FUNDS IL CAROL STREAM, OR CHICAGO?
{ 27 comments… read them below or add one }
He was indicted for lying about the work key.
Kenneth Starr was Hellbent on getting Clinton. He only saw the thing Lewinsky a golden opportunity.
Struck off for lying to a judge.
STFU and move on please, Bill Clinton is no longer the commander in chief of the country. . .
No, he was lying about him was persecuted under serment.Il persecuted because the Republicans were then hellbound and determined to do one way tomber.La sad reality is found. . . even if they succeeded to him in a corner, they could not get a conviction, and yet they always shoot. What kind of irresponsible waste of time, legislative and tax money. And I find your characterization of “Getting blown” disgusting “to quite interesting.
No, he was prosecuted for lying under oath.
You act like this was an isolated case. He was prosecuted for lying under oath, the same thing I Nixon.
He received his Hummer, he was discussing classified information over the phone.
People will believe what they want. Most people can not bother to check the details either.
He sexually harass women, in whom I believe he has forgotten a règlement.Sans that he was lied to God examined, vows, his friends and his country when his marriage took place. In some states, fraud is a crime!
Anyway this was a huge waste of time. Republicans set aside their “Contract with America” and spent their time trying to get Clinton. Really shows what their priorities were the most for the first time in 60 years, and they spend on a partisan witch hunt.
Two cases of perjury in the first degree. (Monika, Paula) You had a minimum of five years for the same chose.Démocrates, here is your man. .
It was not on the BJ, it was about the lie of the BJ (much worse (you do not believe) that the lies that have recently hit by thousands of lives, American and Iraqi).
When the survey was nothing more than a witchhunt, it would be criminal charges in some of the things that the prosecutors have conducted investigations particular. Sex perjury charge has / had come all the best lawyers, highly paid Republican, after six years and at least 46 million dollars of the taxpayers.
Hoist on his own game beaten, some of the useful result of this fiasco sorte.Le is that the independent status Cousel deep sixed after myself.
Of course not. If you could, a pig, Clinton be convicted, the death penalty would threaten. He was convicted of lying under oath. You are not authorized to do so. And no, you’re not allowed to lie about sex, soit.Vous the answer may refuse or say the truth, but you can not mentir.Bummer not it?.
There was never charged, they had a study, but it was nothing, except radié.Je feel what he did was between him and his wife. He has a good job as president. I do not think we had not even asked these questions, either because this was a case of sexual harassment. It was not. I know to be President, you are under the eyes of the public. . . . I do not agree that it could not have a personal life or personal problems. Think about it. . . . Most presidents have no contact with reality. There. . . . His marriage was in trouble, he had problems with money matters Whitewater. If you ask me, it is closer to the real America than any other President.
Republicans investigation Clinton for one reason: they hated him. And they hated him for two reasons: it represents everything they hate – freedom, respect for women, minorities and poor, “Sixties values,” etc. – and because he has won. They never charged Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore and John Kerry, because they have lost. (Except for Gore, and they accused him sort through theft of the election.) No, it was not about sex. If it were, would Newt Gingrich would never have become president, Henry Hyde would never become President of the House Judiciary Committee have, and they have recalculated the: Patti was born seven months after Reagan married Nancy Davis, seven months premature and did not survive the Democrats began 1973-1974 époque.Les impeach Nixon because it is evidence he committed a crime, and he has resigned because Republicans knew that the evidence was real. 1986-87 The Democrats did not try to attack Reagan, because they are not the product. The Republicans knew they had, in 1998-99 no credible or admissible evidence against Clinton, but they did anyway. Why? As Clinton himself said, because they could. And yet they still could not obtain a majority in the Senate controlled it, let alone the two thirds needed for the dismissal because the matters to faux.Les Democrats in 2007? They will not attack Bush and Cheney. Not because they have no proof. They do. His lies and his crimes are legion. But they know that you will like some crazy fool, when you remove a president for party political purposes of his office. Rather, they will keep Bush in office for party political purposes. Remove it and remove the cause of the Democratic vote in 2008. The sooner they nominated for the exterminators, is given to remove the infestation 4th November 2008, and we expect that, if you longtemps.Rappelez: The only thing Ken Starr could support Clinton lying about sex. And even that does not fit the legal definition of perjury or obstruction of justice. He confessed that he had no other pseudo-scandals. It was blocking a $ 80 million. The biggest waste of money in U.S. history. And it was morally wrong and more.The hypocritical Democrats had the moral high ground in 1998. You, in 2007.
He was not to have blown pursued. He was prosecuted for having lied about it under oath in court. Plain and simple.
Clinton has been declared “not guilty” by the Senate. The Republicans were to get Clinton, regardless of what it was. The Republican majority in House of Representatives charged with Clinton, just because they could. You really do not know whether he could be convicted or not care. The whole process has been under a relentless hunt for policy and strategy sournoise.Popularité Clinton still been high, but it was the Republicans a major campaign talking point. Bush has often spoken of his campaign to restore the “moral integrity” to the White House. Is not it ironic!
No, he was lying under oath, which was significant in relation to Monica Lewinsky. Slick Willy was not the first president to have extramarital affairs during his tenure and will not be the last. This is partly because, statistically you will not be selected if you are unmarried or divorced. President Reagan was the only president who had ever chosen to divorce. With regard to the witch hunt together during the Clinton years, it was the Republicans are trying to harm the Democrats seem to have their party in a better picture set for the next election. Kinda like what the Democrats now with “W”! Someone really think the Democrats really give rats behind about President Bush’s Attorney General? Heck no, they just want a bad press for the Republicans. Both sides should stop giving change to the attention of the other bad and to try a beautiful place, wow, it’s a radical idea, right?
It was for lying about them, not the action itself to prosecution.
The republicans were in the hunt for anything they could pin Clinton and all they came with a BJ. Sure it’s lying under oath. . . but I would be lying if I had Hillary’s face! What he did not tell me about or are our nation.Ah yes, a great patron of the neoconservatives who have been hunting for the BJ Clinton was an intern, led by Newt Gingrich. . . That was exactly the same with an intern at this moment!
He was not guilty of perjury and (cons: Scooter was indicted convicted. If you need to know the difference)
was indicted for perjury in a case of sexual harassment.
Any indication of how many Democrats believe the Republican Ken Starr hired to investigate Clinton? Do they not know that was Janet Reno, at the instigation of the majority party in Congress at the time (the Democrats), which appointed a special procut Clinton.Puis to investigate after the Democratic majority Congress renewed the law independent lawyer, was Kenneth Starr by a three judge panel appointed, transferred to the new independent lawyer entitled to meet only Democrats. You can try whatever you want to blame the Republicans, but the facts say, the Justice Department and Congress were in the hands of the Democrats, if a survey commencé.Une independent lawyer is appointed, it is not like Congress may be more tard.S unappoint if they could, would the Republican Congress after leaving unmasked Valerie Plame as Richard armitridge unappointed Fritzgerald.
Well, actually he lied under oath about the BJ and it is what he was charged. I would like to see this immoral person who sent emballage.Le is all the more surprising as he prosecution in any other crimes that he and Hill have taken to avoid in.